Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2000.gada 26.septembra noteikumos Nr.330 'Vakcinācijas noteikumi'

Latvijas Vēstnesis, September 11, 2009 (Nbr. 145)

Dokumenti
Permanent Link: http://lv.vlex.com/vid/gada-septembra-noteikumos-cijas-noteikumi-66591611
Id. vLex: VLEX-66591611

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr.1026

Extract:

Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2000.gada 26.septembra noteikumos Nr.330 'Vakcinācijas noteikumi'

Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr.1026

Rīgā 2009.gada 8.septembrī (prot. Nr.56 43.§)

Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2000.gada 26.septembra noteikumos Nr.330 "Vakcinācijas noteikumi" Iz...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from Latvia including:

  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • Legislation

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
*Informacija par dienu, kad stajas speka Partnerattiecibu noligums zvejas joma starp Eiropas Kopienu un Mikronezijas Federativajam Valstim | Pieņemot piecu jauno tiesnešu svinīgos solījumus | Privatizācijas ziņas | Par A.Slaktera komandējumu | 17 cfr 249.637 - form ats, information required of alternative trading systems pursuant to 242.301(b)(2) of this chapter. | 46 CFR 154.702 Refrigerated carriage. | 41 CFR 102-37.445 - What certifications must a donee make before receiving property? | 49 cfr 375.607 what must i do if i am able to tender a shipment for final delivery more than 24 hours before ... | 14 CFR 215.4 - Change of name or use of trade name. | 40 cfr appendix h to part 50 interpretation of the 1-hour primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards for ozone | 23 CFR 752.10 - Abandoned vehicles. | 48 CFR 1652.204-70 - Contractor records retention. | 10 CFR 455.62 - Contents of a technical assistance program. | 30 cfr 250.104 - how may i appeal a decision made under mms regulations?